![]() If you're still torn on the two, let me just say for the record, the Facecam beats out Razer's offering, hands down. The Elgato Facecam wins out by just looking better overall compared to Kiyo Pro's odd fisheye effect at higher FOVs. I tested the Facecam in a lower light setting to see how it hangs against the Razer Kiyo Pro, itself a webcam that specializes in making places with terrible lighting look better. The camera itself uses a Sony STARVIS sensor, a slice of silicon traditionally used in security cameras optimized for low-light environments. And all without needing to bump down your resolution or frame rate in programs such as OBS. Without getting into a deeper conversation about encoding and compression, the short version is you'll have a final video output with less artifacting with the Facecam than you would when using most other webcams. The Facecam offers uncompressed video at 1080p/60fps, which is a pretty huge deal and might be the biggest reason streamers will want to pick this thing up. Out of the box, the picture quality of the Facecam is great. It's a simple control app that lets you adjust your camera settings in case that's not the ultra-bright look you want. Thankfully, one of the best parts of the Facecam package is its Camera Hub software. It makes the image come off brighter and lighter than your typical webcam, which you could argue is something most streamers want for their main shot. ![]() This does feel like a deliberate choice by Elgato, however. Out of the box, the picture quality of the Facecam is great, though we noticed it seeming a little over-exposed on first impressions. Elgato's webcam is positioned as a premium camera for streamers who aren't quite ready to invest in more expensive options, such as a DSLR camera, but are still looking for the best picture they can get. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |